Home > News > So That’s How Antidepressants Work (in mice)!

So That’s How Antidepressants Work (in mice)!

By Rama via Wikimedia Commons

In the September 17 of Science, a new mouse study of SSRI effects finds that there is a microRNA that is upregulated by SSRIs, and which affects expression of serotonin transporters. This is presumably in addition to the direct inhibition of the reuptake pumps by the drug itself. It’s an interesting new piece of info that helps explain how these drugs work, which is surprisingly mysterious given how widely they are used.

Most people, even many psychiatrists, will tell you that they work by increasing the amount of serotonin in the brain (or if they’re really trying to be smart, the amount of serotonin in the synapse). It’s true that these drugs do in fact do this (in the synapse): it makes basic sense that if you stop reuptake, there will be more serotonin left in the synapse. But does this treat depression and anxiety? Are these maladies simply caused by a lack of serotonin in synapses, or perhaps an insensitivity of the post-synaptic cell which then requires extra serotonin to be activated? These common explanations, again, even by some psychiatrists. But they are wrong. If all we needed was more serotonin in the synapses, then these drugs would work immediately. SSRIs would work just as fast as Tensilon and amphetamine, which increase acetylcholine and dopamine in synapses respectively. It’s well-known that SSRIs take 4-6 weeks or more to take effect, and it’s even more well-known that amphetamine works immediately. So it should be obvious that SSRIs have effects that depend on something besides dumping serotonin into our synapses.

I’m not going to tell you exactly how SSRIs work, because I don’t know. And I don’t know anyone who does. It is likely that by increasing the amount of serotonin in the synapse they affect the sensitivity and/or expression of presynaptic receptors (autoreceptors), thereby effecting subtle changes in the sensitivity and overall reactivity of the serotonin networks. This kind of response would in fact be expected to take a few weeks.

But then there’s norepinephrine.

Image courtesy of Odile Kellermann via AAAS

To me, the interesting thing about the current study, even if it’s just in mice, is that the researchers have demonstrated that SSRIs appear to have downstream effects that include promoting expression of serotonin reuptake in noradrenergic neurons. This is mapped out in the cartoon here. I’m not a molecular biologist, so I can’t and won’t get too deep here, but in this mouse model fluoxetine (Prozac) sensitizes noradrenergic neurons this way, and also inhibits GSK3β. Before today I had never heard of GSK3β, and I don’t know if this is truly meaningful, but Dr. Wikipedia says that another drug that inhibits GSK3β is lithium! Another effective drug that we really don’t know what it’s doing. GSK3β appears to have a number of activities, and one that is interesting is phosphorylation of Tau, the protein that is found in the “tangles” of Alzheimer’s.

I once asked an experienced psychiatrist why he prescribed so much Cymbalta. (Cymbalta is an SNRI, so it works directly on both serotonin and norepinephrine.) His answer was that, although he continues to use SSRIs extensively, he feels that the responses from patients are not as robust as he used to see in the days when he prescribed mostly tricyclics. He thought this might have been from the noradrenergic effect of TCAs that was presumably missing from SSRIs. Now that he has Cymbalta available, he often uses it as a first choice and feels the response is better than from SSRIs.

So maybe the effect from SSRIs is really due to this other effect, however weak, on the noradrenergic system. This would be a blow to the Serotonin Hypothesis purists, but not to the utility of the medications and the patients who benefit from them. It’s unlikely, however, that SSRIs work in only this way. There remains abundant evidence that serotonin itself is somehow implicated in mood and anxiety, so norepinephrine can’t be the whole story. Perhaps, however, it’s been serotonin’s silent partner all along. And maybe these mice brains and their microRNA-16s will help norepinephrine get the co-star billing it deserves.

  1. Sara Cummins
    September 16, 2010 at 5:40 pm

    I was interested in the possibility that norepinephrine might be serotonin’s silent partner. Helen Fisher has done research on the brain chemistry of the different states of lust, romance, and attachment. Her hypothesis is that romantic love is caused by elevated levels of either norepinephrine or dopemine or both, as well as decreased levels of serotonin. Using fMRI (on subjects who were madly in love), dopemine and norepinephrine were found to be elevated in the same brain regions associated with motivation, reward, and addiction (in the caudate nucleus and the VTA). I wasn’t clear from the research if/how the brain chemicals norepinephrine and serotonin work together. I’d be interested in learning more about this – and in how accepted her research is in the scientific community. E.O. Wilson wrote a supportive blurb on the back of her book (Why We Love?), which led me to read it.

    • September 16, 2010 at 7:26 pm

      I’m not familiar with her work, but it’s intriguing to look at how attachment works. Serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine are the three major neurotransmitters in the brain, and they have independent but overlapping networks. Because they’re the biggest game in town, any brain function that is at all complicated (and what’s more complicated than love?) almost by definition has to involve all three of the networks in a complex way. I’m sure she’s written about this already, but the most difficult thing would be untangling cause and effect: is someone feeling love because their neuroendocrine system has been tickled in a certain way, or do the changes occur in response to prolonged feelings of love? And of course there’s also oxytocin which we know lots about in terms of labor, lactation, and sex but, as far as I know, its function in the brain is only beginning to be understood. Thanks for the tip on Helen Fisher.

  2. September 20, 2010 at 8:39 am

    It’s a great piece of work. But it’s also a reminder that we still know so little about the brain – if you’d told me yesterday that SSRIs caused norepinephrine cells to turn into combined 5HT/NE cells, I’d have laughed it off as impossible. I think it’s fair to say that no-one saw this coming. Now I know better, but it raises the question of what else is going on that we have absolutely no clue about yet…

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: